We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
GLOBETECH PUBLISHING LLC

Download Mobile App




New Type of Ultrasound Scan Can Diagnose Prostate Cancer Cases with High Accuracy

By MedImaging International staff writers
Posted on 02 Mar 2022
Print article
Image: Ultrasound scan can detect cases of prostate cancer (Photo courtesy of Imperial College London)
Image: Ultrasound scan can detect cases of prostate cancer (Photo courtesy of Imperial College London)

An ultrasound scan can be used to detect cases of prostate cancer, according to new research.

Researchers at the Imperial College London (London, UK) have found that a new type of ultrasound scan can diagnose most prostate cancer cases with good accuracy in a clinical trial involving 370 men. The ultrasound scans missed only 4.3% more clinically important prostate cancer cases – cancer that should be treated rather than monitored – compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans currently used to detect prostate cancer. The team believes that an ultrasound scan should be used as a first test in a community healthcare setting and in low and middle income countries which do not have easy access to high quality MRI scans. They say it could be used in combination with current MRI scans to maximize cancer detection.

One of the main methods to diagnose prostate cancer is a special type of MRI scan called a multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) scan, which helps doctors see if there is any cancer inside the prostate and how quickly the cancer is likely to grow. However, the scan takes 40 minutes and is expensive. The new study looked at the use of a different kind of imaging called multiparametric ultrasound (mpUSS), which uses sound waves to look at the prostate. The test involves the use of a probe called a transducer to make the images of the prostate. It is placed into the rectum and it sends out sound waves that bounce off organs and other structures. These are then made into pictures of the organs.

The doctor doing the test also uses extra special types of ultrasound imaging that look at how stiff the tissue is and how much blood supply tissue has. These are called elastography, doppler and contrast-enhancement with microbubbles. As cancers are more dense and have greater blood supply, they show up more clearly. Although mpUSS is more widely available than mpMRI there has been no large-scale studies to validate its effectiveness as a test to detect prostate cancer cases.

In the new trial, called cancer diagnosis by multiparametric ultrasound of the prostate (CADMUS), the team recruited 370 men at risk of prostate cancer. They were identified following initial tests such as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test– a blood test to help detect prostate cancer – and/or an abnormal digital rectal examination - a test that examines a person's lower rectum, pelvis, and lower belly. The men were given both mpUSS and mpMRI scans at separate visits. This was then followed by biopsies - which involves using thin needles to take small samples of tissue from the prostate to analyse under a microscope to check cancer – for 257 patients who had a positive mpUSS or mpMRI test result. The team then compared the results from the tests.

Cancer was detected in 133 men, with 83 men diagnosed with clinically significant cancer. Individually, mpUSS detected 66 cases of clinically significant cancer compared to mpMRI which detected 77 cases. Although mpUSS detected 4.3% fewer clinically-important prostate cancers compared to mpMRI the researchers said this method would lead to 11.1 per cent more patients being biopsied. This was because the mpUSS sometimes showed up abnormal areas even though there was no cancer. The researchers believe that the test can be used as an alternative to mpMRI as a first test for patients at risk of prostate cancer, particularly where mpMRI cannot be carried out. Both imaging tests missed clinically-important cancers detected by the other, so using both would increase the detection of clinically-important prostate cancers compared to using each test alone.

“MRI scans are one of the tests we use to diagnose prostate cancer. Although effective these scans are expensive, take up to 40 minutes to perform and are not easily available to all. Also, there are some patients who are unable to have MRI scans such as those with hip replacements or claustrophobia fears. As cancer waiting lists build as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a real need to find more efficient and cheaper tests to diagnose prostate cancer,” said Professor Hashim Ahmed, lead author of the study and Chair of Urology at Imperial College London. “Our study is the first to show that a special type of ultrasound scan can be used as a potential test to detect clinically significant cases of prostate cancer. The can detect most cases of prostate cancer with good accuracy, although MRI scans are slightly better. We believe that this test can be used in low and middle income settings where access to expensive MRI equipment is difficult and cases of prostate cancer are growing.”

Related Links:
Imperial College London 

New
Gold Member
X-Ray QA Meter
T3 AD Pro
NMUS & MSK Ultrasound
InVisus Pro
Radiation Therapy Treatment Software Application
Elekta ONE
New
X-ray Diagnostic System
FDX Visionary-A

Print article
Radcal

Channels

Radiography

view channel
Image: The new X-ray detector produces a high-quality radiograph (Photo courtesy of ACS Central Science 2024, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.4c01296)

Highly Sensitive, Foldable Detector to Make X-Rays Safer

X-rays are widely used in diagnostic testing and industrial monitoring, from dental checkups to airport luggage scans. However, these high-energy rays emit ionizing radiation, which can pose risks after... Read more

MRI

view channel
Image: Artificial intelligence models can be trained to distinguish brain tumors from healthy tissue (Photo courtesy of 123RF)

AI Can Distinguish Brain Tumors from Healthy Tissue

Researchers have made significant advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) for medical applications. AI holds particular promise in radiology, where delays in processing medical images can often postpone... Read more

Nuclear Medicine

view channel
Image: Example of AI analysis of PET/CT images (Photo courtesy of Academic Radiology; DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.08.043)

AI Analysis of PET/CT Images Predicts Side Effects of Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer

Immunotherapy has significantly advanced the treatment of primary lung cancer, but it can sometimes lead to a severe side effect known as interstitial lung disease. This condition is characterized by lung... Read more

General/Advanced Imaging

view channel
Image: Cleerly offers an AI-enabled CCTA solution for personalized, precise and measurable assessment of plaque, stenosis and ischemia (Photo courtesy of Cleerly)

AI-Enabled Plaque Assessments Help Cardiologists Identify High-Risk CAD Patients

Groundbreaking research has shown that a non-invasive, artificial intelligence (AI)-based analysis of cardiac computed tomography (CT) can predict severe heart-related events in patients exhibiting symptoms... Read more

Imaging IT

view channel
Image: The new Medical Imaging Suite makes healthcare imaging data more accessible, interoperable and useful (Photo courtesy of Google Cloud)

New Google Cloud Medical Imaging Suite Makes Imaging Healthcare Data More Accessible

Medical imaging is a critical tool used to diagnose patients, and there are billions of medical images scanned globally each year. Imaging data accounts for about 90% of all healthcare data1 and, until... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2024 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.