We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
GLOBETECH PUBLISHING LLC

Download Mobile App




External Beam Radiotherapy Use in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Does Not Increase Mortality Risks

By MedImaging International staff writers
Posted on 14 Oct 2013
Print article
Early-stage breast cancer patients who receive external beam radiotherapy (XRT) are not at higher risk for serious long-term side effects in the chest region, including increase in deaths from cardiac disease and secondary malignancies, according to new research.

The new study’s findings were presented September 2013 at the American Society for Radiation Oncology’s (ASTRO) 55th annual meeting, held in Atlanta (GA, USA). The study utilized patient data from the US National Cancer Institute’s (Bethesda, MD, USA) Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. It evaluated women identified as having primary stage T1aN0 breast cancer (tumor of 5 mm or less that has not metastasized to the lymph nodes), who received surgery, with or without postoperative radiation therapy, between 1990 and 1997. The analysis was done to determine if XRT was associated with increased mortality due to breast cancer, secondary cancer in the chest area or cardiac conditions for these patients; only patients with breast cancer (BC) identified as the first malignancy were included. The women had a median age of 55–59 and were divided into two groups: 2,397 who received XRT after surgery, and 2,988 who did not receive XRT after surgery.

Cause of death (COD) codes were used to identify cardiac mortality, breast cancer mortality, and deaths from secondary chest tumors to evaluate overall survival (OS), breast cancer survival (BCS), second-tumor specific survival, and cardiac-cause specific survival (CCS), and then compared between the XRT and non-XRT groups. The incidence of mortality was compared between the XRT and non-XRT groups utilizing the Chi-Square test; and, the relative risk (RR) and associated 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were performed to assess OS, BCS, second-tumor specific survival and CCS.

At 10 years post-treatment, OS rates were 91.6% for the XRT patients and 87% for the non-XRT group; BCS rates were 97% for the XRT patients and 95.7% for the non-XRT group; and CCS was 96.7% for the XRT patients and 92.7% for the non-XRT group.

Data analysis additionally demonstrates that, with an average follow-up of 14 years, there was no statistically significant difference in deaths from subsequent non-breast cancers in the chest area, most of which were lung cancers. The number of deaths from cardiac causes was not substantially higher for those patients treated with XRT for left-sided breast cancer, compared to those with right-sided breast cancer among the patient sample and time period reviewed. More women from the non-XRT group died from all causes, including cardiac causes, suggesting that those patients had worse general health conditions than the women who received radiation therapy.

“Breast-conserving therapy, consisting of lumpectomy and XRT, has been an excellent approach to early breast cancer treatment, offering equivalent disease control and better cosmetic results compared to mastectomy as demonstrated by multiple randomized controlled trials in the past,” said Jason Ye, MD, the study’s presenting author and a second-year resident in radiation oncology at Weill Cornell Medical College (New York, NY, USA).

“Our study’s results suggest that serious long-term side effects of radiation therapy, such as increase in deaths from cardiac disease and secondary malignancies, are rare. Radiation therapy is an integral part of early-stage breast cancer treatment for those who choose to have a lumpectomy instead of a mastectomy, with its benefits likely far outweighing the potential risks in majority of the cases. The field of radiation oncology is rapidly changing, with new technology constantly being introduced that may reduce these risks further. Continued long-term follow-up and additional studies are needed to monitor for potential long-term side effects.”

Related Links:

Weill Cornell Medical College



NMUS & MSK Ultrasound
InVisus Pro
New
HF Stationary X-Ray Machine
TR20G
Portable Color Doppler Ultrasound System
S5000
Multi-Use Ultrasound Table
Clinton

Print article

Channels

MRI

view channel
Image: The AI tool can help interpret and assess how well treatments are working for MS patients (Photo courtesy of Shutterstock)

AI Tool Tracks Effectiveness of Multiple Sclerosis Treatments Using Brain MRI Scans

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a condition in which the immune system attacks the brain and spinal cord, leading to impairments in movement, sensation, and cognition. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) markers... Read more

Imaging IT

view channel
Image: The new Medical Imaging Suite makes healthcare imaging data more accessible, interoperable and useful (Photo courtesy of Google Cloud)

New Google Cloud Medical Imaging Suite Makes Imaging Healthcare Data More Accessible

Medical imaging is a critical tool used to diagnose patients, and there are billions of medical images scanned globally each year. Imaging data accounts for about 90% of all healthcare data1 and, until... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2025 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.